Видео

One reason the British extended Quebec control into the Ohio Valley, southward as far as present day Tennessee, was its better relations with the native First Nations. The French had proved themselves much more adept in fostering a collaborative relationship than had the British settlers of the 13 colonies. Britain wanted peace with the First Nations, after its continuing struggles following the Seven Years War.

a very short video so lacks real depth/discussion, but gave a very good point/idea I had not previously considered about the role of government changing society.

excellent

He was neither, and he was both.

Could you imagine if Christianity tried to take over Jerusalem now. There would be a burger king on the temple mount in approximately 12 minutes

I saw a fief once. Stealin' me bread, 'e was!

I am learning so much, each video gives me a brand new rabbit hole to research via the web. Fab channel, hope to see more content!

Thanks for the short, but informative video. I was hoping to learn more though, but I guess this is mostly basic info. I'll subscribe anyway, any quality history channels on RUclips deserve more attention. I'm obsessed about British history, even more so then my own Norwegian history, that probably is more colorful at times, but sadly lack written sources, like for example the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles.

Not bringing up the fact that we live under a US Global Empire, Israel sabotaging anything good. Of course we often refer to the fact that the middle east has plenty of oil, which the petrodollar is entirely reliant on. Would make this conversation a lot more honest. And Syria's civil war is being driven by largely US/Israel/Corporate entitites, makes Bashar al-Assad's dictatorship a lot more reasonable. Especially in regards to the genocide ongoing within Gaza, perpertrated by the Israeli IDF, and financed by the US Taxpayer. I cannot take Western biased commentary on the middle east seriously.

Well done, I'm sure they lack our consent now. "Wilkes and Liberty - 45"

This is full of misrepresentation. The Courts make the Law of the Land, they check the legality of the legislative law. We have the common law, statute, customs, and common law being the law of the land. The UK Constitution tells us we should not have joined, hence all the problems now. Parliament is not a sovereign lawmaker. Dicy misquoted he even admits Parliament is not sovereign. The Bill of Rights is the contract and limits legislation making. Parliamentary sovereignty does not stand up to scrutiny logic history or reason. Handing power to any foreign power is unlawful. It's very annoying listening to these people, who are very intelligent but been taught a polluted education on the constitution.

Villain!! My people were made indentured servants (i.e slaves and sent off to Barbados and other Caribbean islands as well!! ) by Cromwell to suffer either because we were Royalists or Roman Catholics. Listen to the song “ To Hell or Barbados “ for the truth!

Why is it named that?

Cromwell was a Zionist puritan who conducted a demonic crusade against the Irish …his soul rots in hell

she was a warmonger who disowned her 2nd child Sylvia who opposed wwI

With a Catholic in power, Dutch Zionists couldn't control global usery. The City of London was taken from England, no royal can enter to this day, without permission. The City of London Corporation doesn't answer to UK laws, politicians or British monarchy. So much information missing...

The paintings we have of Charles the 1st are so awesome ! A window into the past 😮

I detest the AI images, it really detracts from the credibility of the rest of the video.

There were more Suffragists than Suffragettes.

Who are the hidden Edomite enemy within you can't mention, who opened up the floodgates ? Wake up ! "So shall they fear the name of the LORD from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun. When the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him." (Isaiah 59:19) . . , , ..

You forgot. The Isle of Sark in the channel islands only ended in 2008.

You do not mention the real humanitarian side of his character. He apparently stood shoulder to shoulder with the firefighters during the great Fire of London, helping and encouraging as best he could, and his close involvement with the reconstruction was not just for his own gratification. Meanwhile, Samuel Pepys sat on the sidelines, as far away from the fire as possible, and wrote about it!

On a journey of storytelling and video exploration. With VideoGPT in my toolkit, my content now carries a subtle aura of professionalism that captivates viewers.

3 of my ancestors was part of this rebel they was all Roman Catholic brothers and 2 got tortured and executed they we're from Lancaster

Just skip the actual rebellion waffle. Get to the only bit that matters, the bit that is always glossed over because the story is always told by leftists: what was the result for the people - it seems they were worse off. ie it was a fkn disaster!

Diversity

Yr 8s >>>>

La donna dei miei sogni

Lenin freed the Russians from czarist oppression and replaced it with soviet oppression

Simultaneously we had a growing empire which was producing an abundance of sugar from slave plantations.

It was not an invasion. It was a Dutch special military operation. History is writen by a guy named Victor.

Cromwell was one of the greatest men in history.

No need for the American - We have many who understand the issue better.

The Levellers sound based - I don't have much patience for pacifists.

I went to the same school as Lord Grey, Richmond School in North Yorkshire, albeit some 190 years later.🙂

With the rise of AI threatening to replace human workers in the modern world, perhaps now is the time to demand a universal income? If we can't work, do they have the right to tell us to just go away and starve?

Let’s destroy things that make our lives easier, so we can live. Seems like a great idea!

Charles was a good Christian, and, by the grace of God, carried out his duties as King to protect the liberties of the People. It can be argued that the Stuarts are the last legitimate dynasty of Scotland, England, and Ireland. A strong case can be made that the constituent nations of the UK would be more united today if the descendants of Charles were still Sovereign.

This history homework sucks ass

Propaganda for the elitists

Feudalism was based

Defer back to the bottom of our constitution. Last line states; "shall not be amended or apended." Why do you think John hankock signed twice? Not a mistake, that signature was done on purpose. Do you know why?

(Irish & EU citizen) - This is a good account of the GoI Act 1920 and the creation of the border. However, you need to look beyond the "British view of history" to understand the legacy of violence and why such borders were so damaging for the future. The majority of people living in Ireland had and never accepted the the rule of the British Empire in Ireland. Despite a minority of people in Ireland not wanting Home Rule, the minority had the backing of London & Empire. This empire thinking of divide and conguer is a British Empire strategy that affected Aden, India, Malaysia, Palestine and many of the former countries controlled by the British Empire. The legacy of violence of this policy lives with us up to the present time and has created continued wars in the Middle East and around the world. I would refer to excellent studies in Malaysia and the USA on this "Legacy of Violence". With regards to the current Ireland and the peace process, people on the island now have the opportunity to learn to live together and build a better future. PS similar notations could be said for all the European empires; France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Austria. Spain, Portugal etc That is why the EU is so important for the younger generation to build a Europe of countries that are at peace with each other but remain independent.

He was a fanatic and his capital sin was to believe in the possibility of human purity. I'm Lutheran, nnot Reformed and I know my sinfulness.

Watched this in class

00.22 "Was Lenin a hero? He freed the Russian people from centuries of oppression by the Russian Tsars..." NO HE DIDN'T! There had already been a revolution in Feb 1917 that overthrew the Tsar and ushered in a provisional government that wanted to move towards democracy. Lenin played no part in that because he was living in Switzerland at the time. Lenin organised the Oct 1917 revolution that overthrew this provisional government. I'm amazed a history professor doesn't know this.

Protestant hero , avenging the murders of the saints of GOD , fighting the antichrist system that still is THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH and The So-Called pOPE

I'm learning about josephine butler British people she pretty

What he fighted for? Disunity of church and religious zealotry. Law and order that he broke and ruined? State that he pushed into civil war? Kingdom he unlawfully depeived of a king? What good he did? Fought for pairlament that he stuffed with his supported and finally disolved because it was useless, and make himself a king in an image of octavian but without support of public. British Sulla but worse. Because Sulla's legacy lead into reforms of roman state into roman empire and cromwellian were just lost years.